“I’m proud of our coffee maker,” I commented a few days ago
to my husband.
He is accustomed by now to my anthropomorphic tendencies.
Knowing as he does that I apologize to dishes I drop and thank the car when I pull into the garage at the end of a long drive, he wasn’t particularly surprised to
hear that I was proud of the coffee maker. But, lacking my inclination to imbue
household objects with souls, he also didn’t really care why I was feeling so
warmly toward this particular appliance.
And in fact there was no particular reason. It was just that
earlier that same morning, I’d been thinking about how I’ve had the same coffee
maker for so long that I can’t even remember when or where I bought it, which
is unusual for me. I tend to have a good memory for purchases, and the fact
that I have no memory of the coffee maker’s genesis means we’ve probably had it
for a decade or more.
But it still functions beautifully, and the reason is
that it’s such a simple machine. Compared to other coffee makers on the market,
it’s absolutely bare bones. You put grounds in the filter and water in the
canister; you press a button; coffee soon comes out. It’s remarkable, in the
way that all electric appliances are remarkable to me – meaning that if
stranded on a desert island with an entire General Electric factory at my
disposal, I couldn’t make one myself – but it’s also unremarkable in that it
lacks built-in grinders, timers, steamers, and the many other options with
which fancier coffee makers come equipped.
I’d like to say I’m someone who always appreciates the
simplest models, but that’s not true. I’m definitely attracted to gadgets.
Normally I like new and fancy and multi-featured, especially when it comes to
kitchen appliances or electronics. I’m not at all a noble adherent to the Shaker
motto of “Use
it up, wear it
out, make it do, or do without.”
I’m often guilty of consumerism, and find myself all too eager to move on from
one big chunk of metal and plastic and batteries to another as soon as the
newest model comes out.
But not with the coffee maker. It’s not that I’m indifferent
on the topic. I’m fussy about coffee: I brew a pot or two every day and take
great pains to make it just the way I like it. And I’ve had the opportunity to
try out the more complicated kinds of coffee makers at other people’s houses.
But I don’t need timers and frothers and steamers and programmed delays. (Confession:
when my in-laws gave us that trendy brand of one-cup coffeemaker as a gift, we
returned it, because the idea of pre-measured coffee grounds in little packets disturbed
me too much – how could anyone else know the exact strength I liked my coffee,
when I myself change the amount of grounds from day to day?)
I may wish I had simpler tastes when it comes to computers,
phones, food processors and toasters, but coffee is perhaps the one thing in
which I live up to the otherwise elusive ideal of believing simplest is best.
Our coffee maker is old, but the only part on it required to function is the
on/off switch, and that part still works. I’m proud of it, for having hung in
there so effectively. And I’m somewhat proud of myself that there’s one line of
gadgets in which I’m not seduced by ever-improving technology. I wish I were
like that about more things. But at least there’s coffee, and my wonderful
decade-old coffee maker.
No comments:
Post a Comment